Does anyone else find it odd that the one candidate that has something to say about EVERY issue has been silent so far about the takeover of the federal wildlife buildings in Oregon by armed militia terrorists?
I suppose it makes sense not to say bad things about those likely to vote for you. And it would be difficult to say anything positive supporting armed terrorists. This would have worked so much better for Herr Trump had the militia been BLM members or Muslims.
Time for a 2 part office pool. Contribute to the prize pool and you get to draw a name for a Republican presidential candidate. 50% of the pool goes to the person who draws the name of the first candidate to even speak about the militia takeover. The other 50% goes to the first candidate to support the militia takeover. The same person may win both. I can feel Ted Cruz just dying to hear himself speak. No fair misinterpreting one of Ben Carson’s incomprehensible ramblings as support for the militia. Please use a linguist fluent in Carsonese to interpret. Good luck to all.
UPDATE BELOW:
For those playing at home, it looks like Ted Cruz was the first to comment on the terrorist occupation. He really likes to hear himself talk. Rand Paul gets the award for support for the occupation, although it was very soft support as he noted he was sympathetic to the cause, but could not support violence. And John Kasich won the clueless award as he indicated he knew nothing about the situation. Way to inspire confidence John.
Jim Flanigan Looks at the World 